Adaptation is necessary not only to respond to the projected changes in climate but also because climate change is already affecting many ecosystems. Adaptation activities can have negative, neutral or positive impacts on biodiversity, but positive effects may generally be achieved through, for example: maintaining and restoring native ecosystems, protecting and enhancing ecosystem services, actively preventing and controlling invasive alien species, and developing agroforestry systems at transition zones. Adaptation activities that can have a negative impact on biodiversity include: the construction of artificial coastal protection, changed water management practices, and new cultivation methods such as mariculture or aquaculture, that can introduce to ecosystems new species with the potential to become invasive.
The following table provides examples of some of the many options available for adapting to climate change. Using the research available on these adaptation options managers may be better able to make an informed decision about the threats and benefits to biodiversity under different adaptation processes.
|
Biome |
Adaptation Activity |
Type of Adaptation |
Potential Risk
to Biodiversity |
Possible Action
for Adaptive Mgmt. |
Adverse
|
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Seawalls, dykes and tidal barriers |
Economic and technological |
High if concrete/rock structures are used; Low-medium if mud walls and vegetation
are used |
Include biodiversity (terrestrial and coastal/marine) considerations in Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA)
|
|
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Bridges to cross potentially inundated areas
|
Economic and technological |
Medium-high depending on the location |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
Adverse to Neutral
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Introduction of drought-tolerant varieties |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Low if the growing season is not extended; high if varieties become invasive,
or if extending into marginal lands not previously cultivated |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
|
Introduction of plant varieties tolerant to higher temperatures |
Economic, scientific and technological |
High if using more water for growth or if varieties become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Introduction of pest-resistant varieties |
Economic, scientific and technological |
High risk if varieties become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Introduction of salt-tolerant varieties of native plants and animals for coastal
protection/revegetation |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Low
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity |
Diversion of fresh water to areas suffering water shortage (dams or irrigation channels)
or increased extraction of groundwater supply |
Economic, regulatory and technological |
Medium-high depending on environmental flow, the rate of withdrawal, etc. |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Introduction of salt tolerant varieties of native biota |
Economic and scientific
|
High if varieties become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Inland water biodiversity
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Construction of buildings on stilts |
Economic and technological |
Low if already in urban areas |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Inland water biodiversity
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Establishment of aquaculture, including mariculture, to compensate for climate-induced
losses in food production |
Economic and technological |
High if alien, GMO fish or carnivorous fish (due to harvest of wild fish for food)
are used; high if harmful chemicals are released |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Adverse to Positive
|
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Use of prescribed grazing management regimes |
Regulatory and scientific |
High if overgrazing occurs |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Migration of people from coastal areas and/or marginal lands (e.g., in semi-arid
areas) |
Behavioural and individual |
Low if moving to urban areas, although could place additional pressure on water
and energy resources; high if moving to slightly less marginal areas |
Educate urban planners to minimize the exploitation of natural resources; effect
of other migration may be hard to manage |
|
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Re-zoning in coastal areas |
Institutional and regulatory |
High if high- biodiversity areas are urbanized; low otherwise |
Strategic environmental assessment should consider the impact on biodiversity and
zone accordingly; allow for appropriate conservation areas for biodiversity |
Neutral to Positive
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Institutional and regulatory |
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Mountain Biodiversity |
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Institutional and regulatory |
Low
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Positive
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Introduction or extension of multi-cropping or mixed farming systems (e.g.,
agroforestry systems) to enhance ecosystem resilience; introduction of new crop/animal
species and varieties
|
Economic and scientific
|
Low-medium if replacing an existing crop without extending the cropland; high if
the crop/animal becomes an invasive species |
Assess the potential invasiveness risk of the introduced species; minimize the land
under intensive agriculture |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Changes in grazing management |
Economic |
Low-Medium |
Monitor the effects on biodiversity |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Changes in timing and type of irrigation and fertilizer use |
Economic, institutional and technological |
Low if switching to water saving irrigation; medium if introducing irrigation to
new areas
|
Monitor for changes and/or examine the possibility of introducing the most appropriate
irrigation for the crop and for the fertilizer; timing of fertilizer application
can be important in minimizing the risk to biodiversity |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Low-tillage cropping, maintaining cropping residues and reducing fallow periods |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Low if soil erosion is reduced; high if low tillage leads to increased herbicide
application |
Monitor for gains in biodiversity or reduction in erosion and potential water use |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity |
Abandonment of agriculture |
Economic and regulatory |
Low if native species colonize; high if non-native or invasive species colonize,
or if moderate disturbance (low-intensity grazing) is suppressed |
Management of the abandoned land may be necessary to provide maximum benefits
to biodiversity |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
Marine and coastal biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Low; high if invasive species are used or neighbouring areas are damaged. |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Establishment of corridors, both horizontal and vertical for mountain ecosystems |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Low-Medium if allowing migration of invasive species |
Monitor the migration of plant and animal species in the corridors and the connected
cells of the landscapes, and manage invasive species when detected |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Reduction of other pressures on biodiversity arising from habitat conversion, over-harvesting,
pollution, and alien species invasions |
Regulatory, scientific and technological |
Low, but methods may have secondary effects on biodiversity |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management EIA and
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) on the activities causing the pressures |
|
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Efficient management of rain water |
Behavioural and individual and technological |
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity |
Natural forest regeneration, sustainable forest management / and avoided deforestation |
Economic, institutional and regulatory |
Low if natural forest regeneration occurs and sustainable forest management practices
are used; high if invasive species colonize |
Monitoring to assess the gains for biodiversity
|
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity |
Landscape-scale management |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Low-very low if aimed at benefiting biodiversity |
Monitoring would still be necessary to ensure that the goals are being met; need
to consider and, if necessary, enact policies to deal with land tenure issues and
compensation for reduction in intensity of farming practices |
|
Forest biodiversity |
Practice of low-intensity forestry |
Regulatory and scientific |
Low-medium |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Island biodiversity |
Islands, particularly small islands, are socially and ecologically vulnerable to
climate change. All adaptation activities identified for the thematic areas marine
and coastal biodiversity, inland waters, agricultural biodiversity , dry and sub
humid land biodiversity, forest biodiversity and mountain biodiversity might also
be relevant for island biodiversity but their implementation may need special considerations
. |
|
Adaptation Activity |
Type of Adaptation |
Likely Impact on Biodiversity |
Potential Risk
to Biodiversity |
Possible Action
for Adaptive Mgmt. |
Agricultural Biodiversity
|
Diversion of fresh water to areas suffering water shortage (dams or irrigation channels)
or increased extraction of groundwater supply |
Economic, regulatory and technological |
Adverse to neutral |
Medium-high depending on environmental flow, the rate of withdrawal, etc. |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
|
Introduction of plant varieties tolerant to higher temperatures |
Economic and scientific |
Adverse to Neutral |
High if using more water for growth or becoming invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of salt-tolerant varieties of agricultural plants |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Adverse to neutral |
Low unless salt-tolerant varieties reduce endemic biodiversity by becoming invasive
or extending agriculture into marginal areas |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of pest-resistant varieties |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Adverse to neutral |
Low if limited impact directly on biodiversity; high if invasive alien species
are introduced.
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Institutional and regulatory
|
Neutral to Positive |
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of corridors |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-Medium if allowing migration of invasive species |
Monitor the migration of plant and animal species in the corridors and the connected
cells of the landscapes, and manage invasive species when detected |
|
Landscape-scale management |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-very low if aimed to benefit biodiversity |
Monitoring would still be necessary to ensure that the goals are being met; need
to consider and, if necessary, enact policies to deal with land tenure issues and
compensation for reduction in intensity of farming practices |
|
Reduction of other pressures on biodiversity arising from habitat conversion, over-harvesting,
pollution, and alien species invasions |
Regulatory, scientific and technological
|
Positive |
Low, but methods may have secondary effects on biodiversity |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management EIA and
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) on the activities causing the pressures |
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Neutral-low unless invasive species are used or neighbouring areas are damaged. |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Low-tillage cropping, maintaining cropping residues and reducing fallow periods
/
|
Economic, scientific and technological
|
Positive |
Low; high if low tillage leads to increased herbicide application |
Monitor for gains in biodiversity or reduction in erosion and potential water use |
|
Introduction of drought-tolerant varieties |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Adverse to Neutral |
Low if the growing season is not extended; high if they become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Changes in timing and type of irrigation and fertilizer use |
Economic, institutional and technological |
Positive |
Low-medium
|
Monitor for changes and/or examine the possibility of introducing the most appropriate
irrigation for the crop and for the fertilizer; timing of fertilizer application
can be important in minimizing the risk to biodiversity |
|
Abandonment of agriculture |
Economic and regulatory |
Positive |
Low to Moderate |
Management of the abandoned land may be necessary to provide maximum benefits
to biodiversity |
|
Changes in grazing management |
Economic |
Positive |
Low-Medium |
Monitor the effects on biodiversity |
|
Introduction or extension of multi-cropping or mixed farming systems (e.g.,
agroforestry systems) to enhance ecosystem resilience; introduction of new crop/animal
species and varieties
|
Economic and scientific |
Positive |
Low-medium if replacing an existing crop without extending the cropland; possibly
high-very high if the crop/animal becomes an invasive species or if multicropping
leads to higher use of irrigation water |
Assess the potential invasiveness risk of the introduced species; minimize the land
under intensive agriculture |
Dry and Sub-Humid Lands Biodiversity
|
Diversion of fresh water to areas suffering water shortage (dams or irrigation channels)
or increased extraction of groundwater supply |
Economic, regulatory and technological |
Adverse to neutral |
Medium-high depending on environmental flow, the rate of withdrawal, etc. |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
|
Introduction of salt-tolerant varieties of native biota |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Adverse to Neutral |
Low
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of plant varieties tolerant to higher temperatures
|
Economic and scientific |
Adverse to Neutral |
High if using more water for growth |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Use of prescribed grazing management regimes |
Regulatory and scientific |
Adverse to Positive |
Potentially high if overgrazing occurs |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of pest-resistant varieties |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Neutral to Positive |
Low if limited impact directly on biodiversity; high if invasive alien species
are introduced.
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Institutional and regulatory |
Neutral to Positive |
Medium-high |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of corridors |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-medium if allowing migration of invasive species |
Monitor the migration of plant and animal species in the corridors and the connected
cells of the landscapes and manage invasive species when detected |
|
Landscape-scale management |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-very low if aimed at benefiting biodiversity |
Monitoring would still be necessary to ensure that the goals are being met; need
to consider and, if necessary, enact policies to deal with land tenure issues and
compensation for reduction in intensity of farming practices |
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-neutral unless potentially invasive exotic species are used or neighbouring
areas are damaged |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Reduction of other pressures on biodiversity arising from habitat conversion, over-harvesting,
pollution, and alien species invasions |
Regulatory, scientific and technological
|
Positive |
Methods can have low to high secondary effects on biodiversity |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management, EIA
and SEA |
|
Efficient management of rain water |
Behavioural, individual and technological |
Positive |
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Low-tillage cropping, maintaining cropping residues and reducing fallow periods |
Economic, scientific and technological
|
Positive |
Low; high if low tillage leads to increased herbicide application |
Monitor for gains in biodiversity or reduction in erosion and potential water use |
|
Introduction of drought-tolerant varieties |
Economic and scientific |
Adverse to Neutral |
Low if the growing season is not extended; high if they become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Changes in timing and type of irrigation and fertilizer use |
Economic, institutional and technological |
Positive |
Low-medium |
Monitor for changes and/or examine the possibility of introducing the most appropriate
irrigation for the crop; for fertiliser; timing of fertilizer application can be
important in minimizing the risk to biodiversity |
|
Abandonment of agriculture |
Economic and regulatory |
Positive |
Low-medium |
Management of the abandoned land is necessary to provide maximum benefits to biodiversity |
|
Natural forest regeneration, sustainable forest management and avoided deforestation |
Economic, institutional and regulatory |
Positive |
Low |
Monitoring to assess the gains for biodiversity
|
|
Changes in grazing management |
Economic |
Positive |
Low-medium |
Monitor the effects on biodiversity |
|
Introduction or extension of multi-cropping or mixed farming systems to enhance
ecosystem resilience; introduction of new crop/animal species and varieties |
Economic and scientific |
Positive |
Low-medium if replacing an existing crop without extending the cropland; high if
the crop/animal becomes an invasive species |
Assess the potential invasiveness risk of the introduced species; minimize the land
under intensive agriculture |
Forest Biodiversity
|
Introduction of pest-resistant varieties |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Adverse to neutral |
Low if limited impact directly on biodiversity; high if invasive alien species
are introduced.
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Institutional and regulatory |
Neutral to Positive |
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of corridors |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-medium if allowing migration of invasive species |
Monitor the migration of plant and animal species in the corridors and the connected
cells of the landscapes and manage invasive species when detected |
|
Landscape-scale management |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-very low if aimed at benefiting biodiversity |
Monitoring would still be necessary to ensure that the goals are being met; need
to consider and, if necessary, enact policies to deal with land tenure issues and
compensation for reduction in intensity of farming practices |
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low unless potentially invasive exotic species are used. |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Reduction of other pressures on biodiversity arising from habitat conversion, over-harvesting,
pollution, and alien species invasions |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Medium-high. Methods can have secondary effects on biodiversity |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management, EIA
and SEA |
|
Practice of low-intensity forestry |
Regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Low-medium- |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Abandonment of agriculture |
Economic and regulatory |
Positive |
Low-medium |
Management of the abandoned land is necessary to provide maximum benefits to biodiversity |
|
Natural forest regeneration, sustainable forest management / and avoided deforestation |
Economic, institutional and regulatory |
Positive |
Low |
Monitoring to assess the gains for biodiversity
|
Inland Water Biodiversity
|
Diversion of fresh water to areas suffering water shortage (dams, water transfers,
or irrigation channels) or increased extraction of groundwater supply |
Economic, regulatory and technological |
Adverse to neutral |
Medium-high depending on environmental flow, the rate of withdrawal, etc. |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
|
Introduction of cultivated plant varieties tolerant to higher temperatures |
Economic, scientific end technological |
Adverse to Neutral |
High if using more water for growth; potential increased impacts of invasive alien
species |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Construction of buildings on stilts |
Economic and technological
|
Adverse to Neutral |
Low if already in urban areas |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Landscape-scale management of water resources |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific
|
Positive |
Low-very low if aimed to benefit biodiversity; potentially high if not planned
properly |
Monitoring would still be necessary to ensure that the goals are being met; need
to consider and, if necessary, enact policies to deal with land tenure issues and
compensation for reduction in farming and logging intensity |
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Institutional, regulatory and scientific
|
Positive |
None if the objective is rehabilitation towards a more natural state. |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of aquaculture, including mariculture to compensate for climate-induced
losses in food production |
Economic and technological
|
Adverse to Neutral |
High if alien or GMO fish or other aquatic, including marine, organisms escape,
if eutrophication occurs, or if harmful chemicals are released |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of pest-resistant varieties |
Economic, technological and scientific |
Neutral to Positive |
Low if limited impact directly on biodiversity; high if invasive alien species
are introduced.
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Island Biodiversity
|
Islands, particularly small islands, are socially and ecologically vulnerable to
climate change. All adaptation activities identified for the thematic areas
marine and coastal biodiversity, inland waters, agricultural biodiversity , dry
and sub humid land biodiversity, forest biodiversity and mountain biodiversity
might also be relevant for island biodiversity but their implementation may need
special considerations . |
Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
|
Seawalls, dykes and tidal barriers |
Economic and technological
|
Adverse |
High-very high if concrete/rock structures are used Low-medium
if mud walls and vegetation are used |
Include biodiversity (terrestrial and coastal/marine) considerations in Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA)
|
|
Bridges to cross potentially inundated areas
|
Economic and technological
|
Adverse |
Medium-high depending on the location |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
|
Construction of buildings on stilts |
Economic and technological
|
Adverse to neutral |
Low if already in urban areas |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of aquaculture, including mariculture, to compensate for climate-induced
losses in food production |
Economic and technological
|
Adverse to Neutral |
High if alien or GMOs fish or carnivorous fish (due to harvest of wild fish
for food) are used; high if harmful chemicals are released |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Migration of people from coastal areas and/or marginal lands (e.g., in semi-arid
areas) |
Behavioural and individual |
Adverse to positive |
Low if moving to urban areas, although could place additional pressure on water
and energy resources; high if moving to slightly less marginal areas |
Educate urban planners to minimize the exploitation of natural resources; effect
of other migration may be hard to manage |
|
Re-zoning in coastal areas |
Institutional and regulatory |
Adverse to positive |
High-very high if high- biodiversity areas are urbanized; low otherwise |
Strategic environmental assessment should consider the impact on biodiversity and
zone accordingly; allow for appropriate conservation areas for biodiversity |
|
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Institutional and regulatory |
Neutral to Positive |
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of salt-tolerant varieties of native plants and animals for coastal
protection/revegetation |
Economic and scientific |
Neutral to Positive |
Low
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Institutional, regulatory and scientific |
Positive |
Generally low unless invasive exotic species are used or neighbouring
areas are damaged |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Mountain Biodiversity
|
Introduction of cultivated plant varieties tolerant to higher temperatures |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Adverse to Neutral |
High if using more water for growth |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of pest-resistant varieties |
Economic, scientific and technological |
Adverse to neutral |
Low if limited impact directly on biodiversity; high if invasive alien species
are introduced.
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Institutional and regulatory |
Neutral to Positive |
Low
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of both horizontal and vertical corridors |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific
|
Positive |
Low-medium if allowing migration of invasive species |
Monitor the migration of plant and animal species in the corridors and the connected
cells of the landscapes and manage invasive species when detected |
|
Landscape-scale management |
Institutional, regulatory and scientific
|
Positive |
Low if aimed at benefiting biodiversity |
Monitoring would still be necessary to ensure that the goals are being met; need
to consider and, if necessary, enact policies to deal with land tenure issues and
compensation for reduction in intensity of farming practices |
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Institutional, regulatory and scientific
|
Positive |
High if potentially invasive exotic species are used |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Reduction of other pressures on biodiversity arising from habitat conversion, over-harvesting,
pollution, and alien species invasions |
Regulatory, scientific and technological
|
Positive |
Methods can have secondary effects on biodiversity |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management, EIA
and SEA |
|
Natural forest regeneration, sustainable forest management and avoided deforestation |
Economic, institutional and regulatory |
Positive |
Low |
Monitoring to assess the gains for biodiversity
|
|
Adaptation Activity |
Likely Impact on Biodiversity |
Biome |
Potential Risk
to Biodiversity |
Possible Action
for Adaptive Mgmt. |
Behavioural and Individual
|
Migration of people from coastal areas and/or marginal lands (e.g., in semi-arid
areas) |
Adverse to Positive |
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Low if moving to urban areas, although could place additional pressure on water
and energy resources; high if moving to slightly less marginal areas |
Educate urban planners to minimize the exploitation of natural resources; effect
of other migration may be hard to manage |
Behavioural, Individual and Technological
|
Efficient management of rain water |
Positive |
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Economic
|
Changes in grazing management |
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Low-Medium |
Monitor the effects on biodiversity |
Economic, Institutional and Regulatory
|
Natural forest regeneration, sustainable forest management / and avoided deforestation |
Positive |
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity, Forest biodiversity, Mountain biodiversity |
Low if natural forest regeneration occurs and sustainable forest management practices
are used; high if invasive species colonize |
Monitoring to assess the gains for biodiversity
|
Economic, Institutional and Technological
|
Changes in timing and type of irrigation and fertilizer use |
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Low if switching to water saving irrigation; medium if introducing irrigation to
new areas
|
Monitor for changes and/or examine the possibility of introducing the most appropriate
irrigation for the crop and for the fertilizer; timing of fertilizer application
can be important in minimizing the risk to biodiversity |
Economic and Regulatory
|
Abandonment of agriculture |
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity |
Low if native species colonize; high if non-native or invasive species colonize,
or if moderate disturbance (low-intensity grazing) is suppressed |
Management of the abandoned land may be necessary to provide maximum benefits
to biodiversity |
Economic, Regulatory and Technological
|
Diversion of fresh water to areas suffering water shortage (dams or irrigation channels)
or increased extraction of groundwater supply |
Adverse to Neutral |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity |
Medium-high depending on environmental flow, the rate of withdrawal, etc. |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
Economic, Scientific and Technological
|
Introduction of plant varieties tolerant to higher temperatures |
Adverse to Neutral |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
|
High if using more water for growth or if varieties become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of salt tolerant varieties of native biota |
Adverse to Neutral |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
High if varieties become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of salt-tolerant varieties of native plants and animals for coastal
protection/revegetation |
Adverse to Neutral |
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Low
|
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction or extension of multi-cropping or mixed farming systems (e.g.,
agroforestry systems) to enhance ecosystem resilience; introduction of new
crop/animal species and varieties
|
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid biodiversity |
Low-medium if replacing an existing crop without extending the cropland; high if
the crop/animal becomes an invasive species |
Assess the potential invasiveness risk of the introduced species; minimize the land
under intensive agriculture |
|
Introduction of drought-tolerant varieties |
Adverse to Neutral |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Low if the growing season is not extended; high if varieties become invasive,
or if extending into marginal lands not previously cultivated |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Introduction of pest-resistant varieties |
Adverse to Neutral |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Low if pesticide use is reduced; high if varieties become invasive |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Low-tillage cropping, maintaining cropping residues and reducing fallow periods |
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
Low if soil erosion is reduced; high if low tillage leads to increased herbicide
application |
Monitor for gains in biodiversity or reduction in erosion and potential water use |
Economic and Technological
|
Seawalls, dykes and tidal barriers |
Adverse |
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
High if concrete/rock structures are used; Low-medium if mud walls and vegetation
are used |
Include biodiversity (terrestrial and coastal/marine) considerations in Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA)
|
|
Bridges to cross potentially inundated areas
|
Adverse |
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Medium-high depending on the location |
Include terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity considerations in EIA |
|
Construction of buildings on stilts |
Adverse to Neutral |
Inland water biodiversity
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
Low if already in urban areas |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of aquaculture, including mariculture, to compensate for climate-induced
losses in food production |
Adverse to Neutral |
Inland water biodiversity
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
High if alien, GMO fish or carnivorous fish (due to harvest of wild fish for food)
are used; high if harmful chemicals are released |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Institutional and Regulatory
|
Re-zoning in coastal areas |
Adverse to Positive |
Marine and coastal biodiversity |
High if high- biodiversity areas are urbanized; low otherwise |
Strategic environmental assessment should consider the impact on biodiversity and
zone accordingly; allow for appropriate conservation areas for biodiversity |
|
Establishment of protected areas or management for sustainable use |
Neutral to Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Low |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Institutional, Regulatory and Scientific
|
Landscape-scale management |
Positive |
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity |
Low-very low if aimed at benefiting biodiversity |
Monitoring would still be necessary to ensure that the goals are being met; need
to consider and, if necessary, enact policies to deal with land tenure issues and
compensation for reduction in intensity of farming practices |
|
Rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems
|
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Inland water biodiversity
Marine and coastal biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Low; high if invasive species are used or neighbouring areas are damaged. |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Establishment of corridors, both horizontal and vertical for mountain ecosystems |
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Low-Medium if allowing migration of invasive species |
Monitor the migration of plant and animal species in the corridors and the connected
cells of the landscapes, and manage invasive species when detected |
Regulatory and Scientific
|
Use of prescribed grazing management regimes |
Adverse to Positive |
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity |
High if overgrazing occurs |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
|
Practice of low-intensity forestry |
Positive |
Forest biodiversity |
Low-medium- |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management |
Regulatory, Scientific and Technological
|
Reduction of other pressures on biodiversity arising from habitat conversion, over-harvesting,
pollution, and alien species invasions |
Positive |
Agricultural biodiversity
Dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
Forest biodiversity
Mountain biodiversity
|
Low, but methods may have secondary effects on biodiversity |
Monitor for likely effects on biodiversity and include adaptive management EIA and
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) on the activities causing the pressures |
Adaptation Options
This database provides links to scientific studies and other resources on biodiversity-related climate change adaptation. These examples can assist managers and governments to find adaptation options that will not have a negative impact on biodiversity.
For examples of adaptation plans already in place, please see the map of case studies on the following page.
|
Filter Criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated National Adaptation Project
Type:
Case Study
Date Added:
21 Jan 2008
| The Integrated National Adaptation Project will support Colombia's efforts to define and implement specific pilot adaptation measures and policy options to meet the anticipated impacts from climate change including through: (i) ecosystem planning and management to maintain biodiversity assets; (ii) ... |
The Kiribati Adaptation (Phase 2 Implementation) Project
Type:
Case Study
Date Added:
21 Jan 2008
| The Kiribati Adaptation (Phase 2 Implementation) Project aims to develop and demonstrate the systematic diagnosis of climate-related problems and the design of cost-effective adaptation measures, while continuing to integrate climate risk awareness and responsiveness into economic and operational pl... |
Reef Restoration: Concepts and Guidelines
Type:
Scientific Paper
Date Added:
21 Jan 2008
| These guidelines contain simple advice on coral reef restoration
for coastal managers, decision makers, technical advisers and
others who may be involved in community-based reef
restoration efforts. ... |
Climate Change in Ontario: Impacts on Our Natural Systems
Type:
Web-based Tool
Date Added:
11 Jan 2008
| The website provides a selection of threat studies, vulnerability assessments and adaptation options related to climate change and natural systems in Ontario, Canada... |
Climate Change - Wildlife and Adaptation: 20 Tough Questions, 20 Rough Answers
Type:
Scientific Paper
Date Added:
3 Jan 2008
| RSPB's latest contribution to biodiversity and climate change: Climate Change, Wildlife and Adaptation: 20 Tough Questions, 20 Rough Answers is a concise report addresses some of the key issues posed for biodiversity conservation under changing climatic conditions. The report further seeks to build ... |
|
|
|
|
|